Contamination
Here is a question for Glenn, of interest to all remote viewers. Hopefully our little web skirmish with Joni has quieted down and we can get back to discussing remote viewing.
We know that contamination in a remote viewing session is generated by our conscious mind.
In our protocols we execute a series of exercises involving BLACKBOARD, in which we cue our subconscious to give us an image from the target.
Other data acquisition comes from probing for perceptual data. You touch pen to an ideogram and instantly “know” a sound or texture or smell. We all know how easy it is to insert imaginary data from our conscious mind in this manner.
My question is this: When you encounter an image in the Blackboard exercise (VISUAL IDEOGRAM PLAYFAIR CASCADE or EDGING) what’s the chance that it is contamination/imagination? Can you hang your hat on the visuals more than on perceptual data?
Its very easy to make up the thought of a sound or texture (Buzzing, whirring, or gritty, smooth). Is your conscious mind equally adept at creating an image?
Re: Contamination
My question is this: When you encounter an image in the Blackboard exercise (VISUAL IDEOGRAM PLAYFAIR CASCADE or EDGING) what’s the chance that it is contamination/imagination? Can you hang your hat on the visuals more than on perceptual data?
A> When we teach our sub to put visual impressions on blackboard it is a results oriented process as our sub puts the impressions to blackboard. The imagery impressions may be a bit tilted, or out of sync, little or no illumination quality.
The trick is in recognizing the sub conscious response to the sequence of drill. The sub is cued for visuals by our intent combined with the physical act of Looking and attempting to focus on blackboard while our primary visual acquisition system is turned off because the eyelids are closed.
The feedback process works with the individual recall process to teach the primary consciousness what was target and what was imagination.
An example, after viewing the feedback a student may say, “oh I saw that, but I thought it was imagination” or something along those lines.
Once the handshaking on this drill is refined between you and your sub shapes into a workable arrangement the quality of the visual recall is much better. Primarily because you learn to trust and look at the right time in sync with you sub’s impressionistic sharing.
Aloha