TRV data

I agree with Dick. I encourage you to compare your work to that which is published from other sources. It helps you keep perspective of what exactly you really know upon completion of your session at your current level. Print out a few of these skeds and compare them side by side for contact and quality. Those that are TRV knowledgeable, can better evaluate, if you need help sorting through the trv structure let us know. Aloha

I went to PSI Tech for a look based on something Major Dames stated during his last appearance on Art Bell.

[This is verbatim from the transcript on Art Bell’s home page.]

“I’m going to turn over predictions to all of our viewers in the field. People who have been trained in Module II skills, they have the ability to predict what is coming. For instance, if they were to remote view the next North American disaster…..all of them…..en masse…..would come up with the same thing because they have been trained to do that and these are thousands of people.”

Psi Tech’s Major Ed Dames

On Art Bell Coast To Coast
April 24, 1998

[This is verbatim from the transcript on Art Bell’s home page.] “I’m going to turn over predictions to all of our viewers in the field. People who have been trained in Module II skills, they have the ability to predict what is coming. For instance, if they were to remote view the next North American disaster…..all of them…..en masse…..would come up with the same thing because they have been trained to do that and these are thousands of people.” Psi Tech’s Major Ed Dames On Art Bell Coast To Coast April 24, 1998

Excuse me, I must have missed something, does

Mod II contain training for accurately discerning time and location, these are advanced skills.

Are Ed’s public predictions evidence of PSI-TECH’s use of these advanced skills? If so none of them have happened.

Where is the evidence that there are “thousands of people” working at that advanced skill level?

Glenn posted a perdiction which was well documented and noterized, his team missed it by 8 days but the events were accurate, and his statement was that it was time to go back and sharpen his time skills. We have seen nothing of this quality published by PSI-TECH concerning future work.

Aloha Yaana

Yaana, I have said on numerous occasions that predicting with RV is Risky Business. A short term near future event is really the only one that has a chance to materialize. An event where enough variables are in motion to ensure that it actually occurs.

As to whether proficiency at level Mod 2 in TRV would enable you to predict future events and timelines with any accuracy is doubtful. Those skills to determine date/month/year/location of an event are not part of the coursework in Mod 2. Perhaps in Mod-3.

I have looked at the sessions posted using TRV at a couple of sites and those essential elements of information about the target seem to be pretty sparse. There is nothing in the structure that gives you the timeline. Sometimes you can make up for lack of a timeline with some innovative cueing but that process could be quite lengthy.

To know a thing does not make you its Master. You can give a 900-year-old Sword to a child but it does not understand the potential or value. It is how the child trains and grows with the sword that will reveal what the tool really can do.

Maj. Dames has made TRV available to his commercial clients, what they can or cannot do with it remains to be seen. Keep in mind that TRV is a home study course. How many will learn with the same degree of performance or accuracy as attendance in a resident course with an instructor. The conditions, tasks, and standards are quite a bit different when you’re at home.

My advice to anyone even thinking that they can predict the future is to conduct experimentation with near future events only (within 90 days), develop the protocol for feedback on these events and keep good records. Get some events logged and focus on areas where there is demonstrated performance only.

I don’t think many people understand the magnitude of just determining a little thing like “where is the target”? It is one thing to say “oh it’s a mountainous area” but its an entirely different thing to say, “it is located on the slope of Mount Tamarind” That is a different breed of remote Viewer entirely. Aloha