Two Questions
How long does it take to become an “operational” remote viewer?
First question is for all student remote viewers:
1. DO YOU FEEL YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH TO ‘GET’ A TARGET ALMOST EVERY TIME? Do you think your data is good enough that someone would launch a life or death mission based on your remote viewing? Ed Dames stated on Art Bell the other night that “thousands of students now trained in Module Two have the ability to accurately predict future events.”
I’ve been working very hard at remote viewing for a year now. I think I can get aspects of the target almost every time. Really good data (my roller coaster session) every once in a while. But I wouldn’t put money on my stuff yet. Are there any students out there who feel they really have a firm grip on this yet? From the sessions posted at the Texas Remote Viewing Progress test http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~rwynar/RemoteViewing.html not a lot of us are ready to quit our day jobs. But on the other hand it DOES work. Once in a while we all amaze ourselves, right?
Second question is for Glenn:
2. HOW LONG DID YOU TRAIN BEFORE YOU STARTED GETTING CONSISENT DATA AND GOOD CLEAN VISUAL IMAGES?
Re: predicting future events with RV
How long does it take to become an “operational” remote viewer?
First question is for all student remote viewers:
1. DO YOU FEEL YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH TO ‘GET’ A TARGET ALMOST EVERY TIME? Do you think your data is good enough that someone would launch a life or death mission based on your remote viewing? Ed Dames stated on Art Bell the other night that “thousands of students now trained in Module Two have the ability to accurately predict future events.”
So how come no one has ever `hit’ a future event on the money? Ed Dames also states that predicting geophysical events such as earthquakes & vulcanism, is a `piece of cake’. as of yet,neither he or any of his students have produced any qualifing data to back up these boasts!
Re: predicting future events with RV
So how come no one has ever `hit’ a future event on the money? Ed Dames also states that predicting geophysical events such as earthquakes & vulcanism, is a `piece of cake’. as of yet,neither he or any of his students have produced any qualifing data to back up these boasts!
Its our understanding that the military (Army Special Forces) did not employ remote viewing as a predictive tool.
Now that they are out of the military, Glenn and some of his fellow RVers are trying to see if it can be used to see future events. They did pretty well on the “light in the sky” event off Oahu. (SEE PREDICTION EXPERIMENT PAGE)
As for PSI tech claiming predicting earthquakes is a piece of cake….ask Ed. I didn’t see any techniques for identifying TIME or GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS in the Module II tape.
If any students are that far along, we would love to hear from them and work some targets with them!