NEWS: Analysis & Commentary Page 2 Discussions on Remote Viewing Part 6 by Jimmy Williams Discrimination. This is not like that. This is not with that. This is the complement of association. All the meaning we perceive, exists between the vacuum of space and the highly defined point created by the gravitational wells of spatial bodies. If gravity were an absolutely irresistible force, all there is would fall together in a Big Crunch. There would no longer be any meaning to the concept “Universe”. One set of associated ideas or events is unique from another set of ideas by virtue of our ability to disassociate one from another. As association and disassociation change, the topography of the conscious field changes. Perspective. Events as we conventionally perceive them are organized in meaningful ways due to their angle of incidence in space-time relative to the percipient. This is how our mind assigns causality. Consciousness as a field is superior to but coexists with spacetime. A portion of the conscious field is intimately connected with and conditioned by the four dimensions. This aspect of mind processes the world in terms of causality. This is the appropriate domain for rational, analytical thought. What is interesting about remote viewing is that it teaches the viewer to collect data from that part of the field that is not preconditioned to four-dimensional constraints. By disconnecting the normal analytical mode of thinking, we are able to retrieve data unrestricted by space and time. As Rene Warcollier states in his book Experiments in Telepathy, “In fact, telepathy almost never manifests itself to the percipient by a sense-image or a memory-image of the agent.” Which is to say, the data is not perceived with the analytical and rational framework intact as it applies to direct sensing or as it applies to memory. “It seems that memory or sense images disintegrate into their component elements; and it is from these elements, revived by the percipient, that the creative imagination reconstructs, as well it can, the perception or memory-image of the agent.” The characteristics of the conscious field, apart from the constraints of the matter-energy-gravity fields are such that “meaning” is divorced from sequential, causal references. The information is there but the framework in which it is normally understood is missing. Association is king when time and space are rendered irrelevant. Remember, at the speed of light, quantum mechanics breaks down. At lower velocities special relativity breaks down. In the conscious field space-time and causality breaks down. All are accurate pictures of how the universe works, but each is king in its own domain. Meaning. How we assemble data has to do with our unique qualities of creative intelligence. It also has to do with all the other factors I have mentioned till now: The multidimensional aspect of the conscious field, field strength, singularity, association, discrimination and perspective all play a part. When we attempt to remote view, we establish an association with a field in the matrix that has some level of identity and cohesion of its own. It is a thing or event that exists in the past or future. It has a topography governed by the physical matter, energy and consciousness that give it meaning. We approach it following a chain of associations. As remote viewers, our approach to a target is conditioned by our ability to manage the data. Each person is unique in the way they filter data through their conscious and subconscious mind. We perceive what we can. The rest is filtered out. As a conscious being approaching an event in the matrix, the way one senses and reports data and ones ability to home in on the intended subject are totally governed by our unique nature. It takes skill and practice to learn to collect data without altering the subtleties of the field with ones own ideas and memories. This environment is tenuous and subtle. Ones thoughts have field strength of their own. Thoughts can create new associative relationships as one enters the field of the target. When this happens it becomes difficult to navigate. Biases of our own creation can cause us to miss that target entirely. Memories from our prior associations can overlay and confuse what is really there. One difficulty of the topography is that there are times when personal preferences pull us toward something we naturally find more interesting. The landscape of the consciousness field is filled with subjects in close proximity to one another due to associative linkage. It is easy to lose focus and go chasing after something other than the target. If the subject being remote viewed were a cat up a tree, I would be attracted to the fire truck that had come to assist. That fire truck appeals to me; the cat doesn't. If this were my beloved cat up the tree, I would be infused with emotion but probably War collier wouldn't notice fireman Bob. Well-disciplined remote viewers can manage the distractions and apply themselves to the target that was tasked. The remote viewing problem imposed by the World Trade Center event is one of field strength. Similarly, if you attempt to view the center of Hiroshima today, there is a fair chance that you will be sucked in to the event horizon of the atomic explosion of 1945. Field strength in the consciousness field can and often does overwhelm space-time. In conclusion, I would like to say that remote viewing could be the pry bar that opens us up to a grander perspective of our universe. If consciousness is a fundamental force of nature, many of the anomalies we see, like remote viewing and other psychic functioning, suddenly become simple in a way that anyone can understand. Maybe Einstein was right. Maybe regular people will be able to understand when we finally see the simple, beautiful truth of it all.    PRINT THIS ARTICLE * (Discussions on Remote Viewing, Introduction, Part One, February R.V. News) * (Discussions on Remote Viewing, Part Two, March R.V. News) * (Discussions on Remote Viewing, Part Three, April R.V. News) * (Discussions on Remote Viewing, Part Four, May R.V. News) * (Discussions on Remote Viewing, Part Five, June-July R.V. News) Privacy Statement Copyright © 2001, H.R.V.G. All rights reserved.

AUGUST-SEPTEMBER ARTICLES ·Remote Influencing ·NYC Trip ·Gathering Sounds    Sketches    Sketch 1    Sketch 2    Sketch 3    Sketch 4    Sketch 5    Sketch 6    Sketch 7    Sketch 8    Sketch 9    Sketch 10    Sketch 11    Sketch 12    Sketch 13 ·Stray Cat    Page 2 ·Play It Again SAM! ·Discussions on RV ·The Sports Book