Entrainments…

Glenn writes:

I did nothing more than make the event no longer random. I merely let it happen as it played out just as I had observed it.

I attempted an entrainment exercise this week. It was an interesting experience. As usual Glenn makes things seem simpler than they are in reality. He makes a simple entrainment seem easy. It is not.

I ran a test selecting poker chips by color; 5 games of 4 chips with the possibilities being red, white and blue. I planned and rehearsed and observed and felt I had control of the environment. I did not.

My subject was subconsciously resisting the exercise. He verbally agreed to participate but was irritated and contrary and selected chips not with a measured intent but rather with an impatient aloofness. I didn’t plan for that.

He fell into the entrainment by fifth and final game with the chips matching perfectly. But I had designed the exercise with the fourth game as the benchmark.

Back to the drawing board. I will have to learn to master the environment and start with a more willing participant.

A more detailed report to follow at Monday’s class in Kaneohe.

Glenn:

What do you mean by entrainment? What is it?
RG

Aloha,

Recent classes on the topic of masking and entrainment have led to experimentation using various applications of entrainment by many of you. A few things to keep in mind as we move along is the need to remember basic theory about mechanism and environment. Conflicts may arise from self-awareness and confusion with how one deals with the result or the effect of entrainment. Do not be confused about whether or not the activity itself constitutes some form of remote influencing. It is not remote influencing. I have said many times that remote influencing is not viable in applications because of the gain problem, but is a theoretical possibility. Some years back Dick and I wrote an article in the newsletter about an experiment to change the past. In the article we laid out the premise and highlighted issues regarding the challenge that remote influencing presents. The ability to remotely influence would surely be a super power. Entrainment is not such a super power; it is more a maneuvering of consciousness to various points of observation to load variables to favor an unfolding of events in such a way as to let events happen with an observers effect. Albeit the effect is small it is very detectable and results are quantifiable.

Those of you who were present for the demonstration that I conducted to show that entrainments do work have some sense of scale of what can be accomplished. The subsequent Keno entrainment in Las Vegas was another real world application that succeeded very nicely. When you ask me how did you do that? My response is that I let it happen. Have you ever been somewhere and seen events begin to stack in your observation where the outcome became evident to you before it happened? Perhaps it is something you could have stopped if you acted. An example such as you notice a tack on the floor just as someone enters the room and you watch as the person does just what you knew they would do. What if you had already been there and seen it all from all the possible perspectives. What if you had played all the parts in the event? What if you had walked into the room to see the tack and maneuvered around it with your consciousness. A replay would show the person not stepping on the tack. And what if he then did not step on the tack when he entered the room? Did you influence it? No, you merely let it happen, as it had to happen with the variable stacked as they were now. You changed the consciousness math of the equation by adding the weight of the observer’s effect.

Being a remote viewer allows you to be eminently qualified to entrain with some deft and skill. While I can entrain the actions of 5 people randomizing poker chips and let the ones I chose be selected at the right time by the right person I did nothing more than make the event no longer random. I merely let it happen as it played out just as I had observed it.

So keep your wits about you in this endeavor and don’t look for any great magic to spring forth just see how it will happen then let it.

Glenn

Aloha RG,

Let me see if some previous posts claify it. Then I will follow up and give you a summary explanation.

Glenn

[Start message header]

Subject: Entrainment????
Poster: RG
Date: 2004-05-28 04:24 HST
Message ID: 20046
In Reply To: 20033
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Just wondering how you are useing the word "entrainment," with regards to RV. My understand if the word:

The Entrainment Transformation Principle

A physics phenomenon of resonance, first observed in the 17th century, has an effect on all of us. Entrainment is defined as the tendency for two oscillating bodies to lock into phase so that they vibrate in harmony. It is also defined as a synchronization of two or more rhythmic cycles. The principle of entrainment is universal, appearing in chemistry, pharmacology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, astronomy, architecture and more. The classic example shows individual pulsing heart muscle cells. When they are brought close together, they begin pulsing in synchrony. Another example of the entrainment effect is women who live in the same household often find that their menstrual cycles will coincide.

Discovery of Entrainment.

The history of entrainment is linked to Dutch scientist, Christian Huygens in 1665. While working on the design of the pendulum clock, Huygens found that when he placed two of them on a wall near each other and swung the pendulums at different rates, they would eventually end up swinging in at the same rate. This is due to their mutual influence on one another.

Musical Entrainment.

The entrainment process is quite evident in music. It is possible to have rhythmic entrainment, melodic entrainment and dynamic entrainment. Entrainment music has the potential to (1) resonate with the listener’s feelings, (2) transform negativity into positivity, and (3) promote a state of liveliness or serenity. Certain sounds, in specific sequence can help bring the listener from one place to another.

The special music from Sound Feelings has been developed with the entrainment transformation principle in mind. It creates a type of sound “mirror” that first reflects the current stress or turmoil of the listener, and later reflects the desired mood and feeling. As the music gradually transforms, its resolution may be experienced in the listener, physically or emotionally.

Aloha,

For those of you in class tonight who took part in the Entrainment Exercise thank you very much for participating. Entrainment is such a subtle skill but with not so subtle effects. The test was done in such a way as to make you see what the individual can in fact design and implement. Please do not confuse the results of tonight with influencing. It was simple entrainment, nothing else.

I would like to discuss this exercise again prior to our trip to the RV conference. Aloha Glenn

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: Entrainment????
Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2004-05-28 06:03 HST
Message ID: 20047
In Reply To: 20046
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha RG,

Entrainment is normally associated within the Guild with the terms "Masking" and "Overlay". Entrainment is the active emulation of an arbitrary target Mask Overlay with a real target of interest. The Targeteer will create a mask, or mask overlay, for a target of interest, and then task the remote viewers against the arbitrary mask overlay. This has been discussed over the years here as well as entrainment. Another process employed by the Targeteer entrains the target to the mask overlay making it a sort of mirror where ripples from the real target become observable as reflections in the mask.

It is a difficult process to understand at best. The class on Monday was a demonstration of entrainment. It is sort of like looking between the real target and the mask for the active element. Before training Guild members to construct reliable mask overlays they must get some time working with practical concepts of entrainment. Without entrainment a target mask is only good for that one picture in time.

It is not the policy of the Guild to advocate the use of entrainment without very careful thought and consideration to all aspects of privacy, free will, and other ethical concerns.

I think Debra in her post hinted at how one feels when they seem to not have been in control when they thought they were. There will be some that say entrainment is remote influencing but it certainly is not that. What it is, is more of an anomaly of like fields buffing each other up.

Check some of the previous threads on this bbs for more info.

Aloha Glenn

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Entrainment
Poster: Debra D-T
Date: 2004-05-27 17:56 HST
Message ID: 20045
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Yes, Jason, as one of the participants in Monday’s class I have also been thinking about and trying to understand the mechanism and applications of entrainment. Initially, as a seemingly unwitting participant in the exercise, I felt uncomfortable and violated. I wondered where and when else I had been entrained. After those thoughts subsided, my desire was to learn how this works, what I could use it for and resolve out moral implications for myself. I would love our classs to explore this more and devise our own "games" to develop our skills. I am looking forward to more discussion on this topic.
Aloha,
Debra

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: Entrainment
Poster: jimmy
Date: 2004-06-01 00:05 HST
Message ID: 20059
In Reply To: 20045
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Debra, I have been following the Entrainment Thread and find it to be very interesting. I am new to this web-site, but have, Dick Allgire’s video tape on Remote Viewing " Volume 4 " and again, very interesting. I have enlosed a article written by John Collier and Mark Burch, " Order From Rhythmic Entrainment " – Chapter 5 : Measurement, Third Par. – has -" Sensing is similar to measurement " – Understanding these skills, I feel could open new areas of knowledge in each of us. I thank everyone, at HRVG for the excellent contributions they are making.
jimmy

Yes, Jason, as one of the participants in Monday’s class I have also been thinking about and trying to understand the mechanism and applications of entrainment. Initially, as a seemingly unwitting participant in the exercise, I felt uncomfortable and violated. I wondered where and when else I had been entrained. After those thoughts subsided, my desire was to learn how this works, what I could use it for and resolve out moral implications for myself. I would love our classs to explore this more and devise our own "games" to develop our skills. I am looking forward to more discussion on this topic. Aloha, Debra

Link: Order From Rhythmic Entrainment and the Origin of Levels Through Dissipation

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: Were You Entrained in Monday’s Class?
Poster: Jason
Date: 2004-05-26 03:12 HST
Message ID: 20041
In Reply To: 20033
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Heres a re-post from last year regarding entrainment.

Subject: At the Well of Entrainment…

Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2003-08-27 20:07 HST
Message ID: 18674
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

At the Well of Entrainment

I remember as a small boy growing up in Louisiana the train tracks that circumvented our bayou in St. Landry Parish. Each day there were several trains that roared along the tracks heading East or West to who knows where. When we were out running the paths along the swamps and heard the trains we would always race to the tracks nearby to watch the big cars rush by and be enveloped in the circadian wash of something so large moving so fast. On a hot summers eve just before dusk we would stand perhaps 3 feet from the tracks as the big cars rushed by and watch for the lightning leaping from the ground to the moving cars. The heat and dust with so much steel and iron moving so fast made for quiet a light show when the conditions were right. As the last few cars would pass is when you could feel it the most. A sense that you too were moving, that you too were racing down the tracks. A sense of power and speed that gradually faded as the train moved off and away down the tracks. After the last car passed we would leap onto the tracks and stand very still facing the direction the train was moving. In those moments you could feel the air vortexes still rushing and the last of the earthy rumbles as you stood on the steel track or the wooden ties and you could ride the train just a bit longer in the sensories playing out in your mind. Sometimes late at night you could hear the rumble of the trains in the distance and the mournful whistle before it passed beyond the bayou. You could close your eyes and relax and experience the rush of the train moving through the night almost as if you were there. It was a sense of entrainment. While it really had nothing to do with trains it had everything to do with observation and circumstance.

When we stood as kids near the tracks we would be washed by an enormous electromagnetic field moving very quickly. Elements within our own living biogenic field would fluctuate and begin to modulate under the influence of the greater field while parts of our own self-generated fields were ripped away to race along with the train. A coalescence of radically different fields occurred as the overwhelming ingress of the greater field began to entrain the lesser field into rhythmic synchronization towards a temporary harmony of fields. The concept of entrainment is just this simple.

Entrainment in Remote Viewing is far more Elegant, but just as interesting and rewarding. I have almost finished my outline for the Monday’s Class in which we will build a masking model and entrain it. The results of the Previous 2 week’s targets on masking will also be published back to the class then.

Aloha Glenn

[End message content]

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Keno Entrainment, a Gem, Don’t Throw it Away.
Poster: George
Date: 2004-06-26 00:55 HST
Message ID: 20158
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

The Keno entrainment experiment is a gem. It looks to me as though the over all odds on this will likely be over a million to one, maybe higher. The odds are easy to calculate and argument about the odds or experiment is silly, as the casino has put excellent controls on the your experiment. If HRVG puts it all together with some affidavits it would function as LEGAL PROOF! This proof would be very simple and have many uses. A million to one is VERY hard to argue with.

One of these uses might be if a good lawyer somewhere wants to help bring out the truth he might even serve such affidavits on people like Randi and force them to clean up their act!

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Were You Entrained in Monday’s Class?
Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2004-05-24 22:56 HST
Message ID: 20033
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha,

For those of you in class tonight who took part in the Entrainment Exercise thank you very much for participating. Entrainment is such a subtle skill but with not so subtle effects. The test was done in such a way as to make you see what the individual can in fact design and implement. Please do not confuse the results of tonight with influencing. It was simple entrainment, nothing else.

I would like to discuss this exercise again prior to our trip to the RV conference.

Aloha Glenn

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: Were You Entrained in Monday’s Class?
Poster: Jason
Date: 2004-05-26 03:06 HST
Message ID: 20040
In Reply To: 20033
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Thank you very much for having this class.

Perhaps the entrainment exercise had a stronger impact on myself because I was the person that picked the chips that was *designed* to be picked in the exercise.

Besides Glenn, four of us participated in the exercise. The four of us knew nothing about what we going to do, except for one thing Glenn said. "We’re gonna do a little exercise". Ahhh, an exercise, and it’s little.

Each of the four people were given a blue poker chip and a white poker chip with their first initial written on both chips. All eight chips were placed in the center of the table with the initialled side faced down. The four of us stuck our hands to the center of the table and began mixing the chips up. We pushed chips to the left, chips to the right, this chip that way and that chip this way, mixing them around until no one knew where their chips lay. Then the first person picked a blue chip and a white chip, and only Glenn and that person were shown which initials were written on the chips they had chosen. Those two chips were placed back into the center and the mixing process was repeated. The second person did the same, picked a blue and white chip, and only Glenn and that person were shown which initials were on those chips, then the chips went back into the mix. Then the third person, that’s me, I picked a blue chip and a white chip. Glenn and I looked at the initials that were written on the chips. Glenn placed the two chips on the table with the initials facing up. The blue chip had a "D" written on it and the white chip had a "P" on it. Then Glenn said to me while pointing towards the right side of the room, "Lift up the carpet and look for a piece of paper". So I walked over and lifted up the area carpet and there lay a piece of paper folded in half. I unfolded the paper, and the writing on the paper read:

3rd game

Blue – D
White – P

Hmmm, so as I stood there with this big grin on my face, the first thing I thought was, How did he do this. The second thing I thought, What was this exercise about.

This was not precognition. This was not remote influencing. This was… entrainment.

The piece of paper had been placed under the carpet at least an hour before any of us had shown up at the house. The entrainment exercise had been designed so that on the third "game", the third participant would pick a specific pair of poker chips.

So how did this happen? As best as I understand it, and in simple lay terms, Glenn had constructed an architecture of the third "game". The four of us came in and participated in the "game", in the architecture, and played it out as Glenn had designed it to be played out. We were part of the architecture of the third "game". We had become entrained in the game, with the game, by the game. The third game. Which only lasted a minute or so.

Entrainment was briefly discussed in the Masking/Overlay classes we had last year. Hearing about in class was interesting and exciting. But actually seeing it implemented, as with the exercise on Monday, is quite an experience.

Entrainment may be difficult for some people to grasp. You’ll have to stretch your thinking a bit. I spoke to Glenn about entrainment for quite a while after Monday’s class. I also talked to him the following day about it. It still boggles my mind.

We haven’t been taught the mechanism behind entrainment, yet. Hey Glenn, maybe after Las Vegas we can have a few in-depth classes on this. And we’ll probably need to see it implemented a few more times to fully understand it *hint*hint*

Those of you that were at class on Monday, have you sat down and thought about what actually happened in the exercise. Or maybe you’re still thinking about it like myself.

Heres a few definitions of the word entrain. I pulled these from dictionary.com. They seem to fit, in a certain way:

1. To pull or draw along after itself.

2. Chemistry. To carry (suspended particles, for example) along in a current.

To draw along as a current does; as, water entrained by steam.

Aloha,

Jason

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Entrainments…
Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2004-06-16 03:40 HST
Message ID: 20110
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha All,

The entrainment experiment in Las Vegas went fairly well. The game as discussed below was Keno at the Texas Station. The period of play encompassed 1 full hour from 12am to 1am. A total of 8 games were actually played by the participants although 15 games occurred during the period. There were some interesting plays and the "Way Ticket" seemed to be more successful than a straight ticket. Everyone did play additional 10 spot tickets vying for the 1 million dollars on 1/10 ticket for 1$.

The stark difference in success between the period of entrainment play and regular play (the control play) makes entrainment look like more promising as an approach to a chance problem like gambling. It took almost 2 hours to design the entrainment and there were some discrepancies between the design and the execution of the entrainment.

One discrepancy was that the entrainment was designed for 1 less person playing than the number of people who actually participated. The design called for each to win but not for each to win multiple times. The level of cash won seemed to fall between 240 to 284 dollars with an anomaly occurring with the win by Maria. Not everyone won cash at that level either.

I had commented on an earlier occasion that success from a single design placed 5 as the optimum number of participants. Future tests should include multiple participants in the design phase to see if the effect can be expanded to encompass more participants.

The next scheduled class I will begin with a lecture on entrainment design. I hope those of you that attend take scrupulous notes as I will give this lecture only once, so do not expect it to be rehashed. Concepts must be understood and belief is an important factor. Entrainment is merely a repositioning of a critical point of observation and its use in remote viewing could be limitless.

It is also a skill, not only of the design but also of the designer. Masking and entrainment are powerful RV tools and for the tools to be used they must be understood and employed with the greatest care. Adherence to protocol and method is not suggested it is required. Ego and the tendency to credit success to other reasons such as super powers of an individual must be set aside.

The entrainment effect is certainly a wonder when observed and I would like the concepts regarding entrainment to be followed and not changed to suit your ideas on the topic. The concept model is directly related to its use in masking.

Entrainment is also time sensitive so we will discuss time a bit in the lecture also. Entrainment is the ebb and flow of variables that have been positioned to travel together where observational perspective is its engine.

You might want to reread my post on Piggybacking on the Mobius prior to class. It was this effect that led to theorhetical entrainment.

[Start message header]

Subject: Piggybacking on the Mobius!

Poster: Glenn Wheaton
Date: 2000-08-29 14:28 HST
Message ID: 9307
Has Replies:
[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha,

Earlier on the BBS I presented a problem where non-target data was collected in a session that was corroborated by another viewer working the same target.
The target was orchestrated in such a way as to maintain the integrity of the Targeteering process while isolating the non-target data to its’ relative cause.

This relative cause is Piggybacking.

Piggybacking is the anomalous modulation of spurious data, information, or noise onto a carrier or signal that is detectable at levels within the primary signal and/or its harmonics.

You have heard me say many times that all remote viewing session work is a combination of good data, bad data, and contamination. While the viewer must assume responsibility for that which they produce in session, some of the contaminants in the work are the result of piggybacking.

Piggybacking occurs when the target selection is made within a process that is conducive to its transmission.

Let’s look at the Targeteering process.

Someone must select the target. For the purpose of this information automated target selection is considered non-relevant. This means a real person has the primary responsibility to select a specific target to be worked by a viewer or a group of viewers.

One of the earliest things we accept in the RV community is that somehow the person selecting the target and providing the target ID has somehow managed to make that target ID a pathway to the target for the viewer.

It is considered that the act of selecting the target to be viewed by the viewer is sufficient enough in itself to enable access to the target by the viewer. This means no ID is really necessary. Target ID’s are more for the administrative quantification of handling targets worked by viewers, this includes referencing, sorting, storing, and retrieving target data.

Humans are considered to be a compliant system for making the special association between what constitutes the target and the viewers who will work the target.

For any acceptance of any remote viewing data you must believe this compliance between the Targeteer and the target is a functional mechanism. The viewer must have confidence in the target selection methodology.

Consider for a moment a person who selects multiple targets to be worked by a viewer in a single session. This is not normally done and could actually constitute a form of abuse. The facts as they develop in the work of the viewer will reflect data peaks from several target sources competing for the viewer’s attention as well as contamination from other sources of noise.

The majority cause of Piggybacking is PROXIMITY to the primary target selected. This means proximity of any form to the selection and Targeteering process. Ideally Targeteering would be done under clean conditions, which would include Faraday isolation as well a short period of inactivity pre and post target selection.

This is not a case of Telepathic Overlay.

Piggybacking occurs from real components of contamination. As an example a person Targeteering the London Bridge as a target for the viewers could think about really getting data on Goldilocks and the 3 Bears till the cows came home but none of that would influence the target data generated by the viewers. It is just not strong enough to influence the real hard data on the target.

Piggybacking occurs when a proximity violation occurs that allows the modulation of the contamination along with the intended target. Piggybacking is also far less in intensity than the actual target. It is for the most part buried deep within the signal line for the target.

It is like a side path from the target that was set up at the time of Targeteering by a contaminated process. Instead of a single 4-lane highway to the target you have a three-lane highway and a small dirt road. If in the process of working the target you get off the main road you are on the dirt road to the whiskey still instead of the Facility at Sugar Grove.

Piggybacking is real noise because it is normally associated to a real source. Knowledge about a truth is a far stronger signal than a fear about some other form of ingress on the target.

If you had occasion to look over other prospective targets prior to selecting one to work, that would constitute a far greater Piggybacking threat than a fear of Goldilocks and the bears emerging in the target work. It is directly related to reality in most cases.

Targeteering implies great responsibility.

It requires control of the Targeteering process and all its’ components. What the Targeteer does reflects in the results achieved. To minimize Piggybacking requires due diligence in the Targeteering process.

Aloha Glenn

[End message content]

It is really all about signals and noise. Understand each and its effect on the other and you will understand many secrets in life.

GBW

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: Entrainments…
Poster: Jason
Date: 2004-06-16 06:37 HST
Message ID: 20115
In Reply To: 20110
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha Glenn,

Being a participant in the two entrainment exercises, I can definitely say that the effects of entrainment was a wonder to observe and contemplate. The first entrainment exercise involving the poker chips was small, simple, and to the point, while the keno entrainment was much larger with many variables, some known and perhaps others unknown, coming into play. The outcome in both cases displayed very positive results, albeit the keno entrainment contained some discrepancies as you noted.

I must say that I have not been this thrilled about a remote viewing related concept since I first learned to remote view, or when I first learned S5 Morpheus.

As for Piggybacking, I’m sure the old timers in the Guild remember some of the instances when Piggybacking occurred. In one instance, the process to produce Piggybacking was executed on purpose to show us that it could have a real effect on a viewer’s data, and occasionally Piggybacking surfaced accidentally through improper targeteering.

We have learned a lot over the years, but there is still much more to learn. I look forward to our next class.

J.

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Glenn, Integrity, and Guild Demonstrations
Poster: Dick Allgire
Date: 2004-05-31 20:26 HST
Message ID: 20062
In Reply To: 20055
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

This entrainment demonstration is nothing new, and really not that out of the ordinary here in the guild. It’s unfortunate, but unless you have sat in class and watched Glenn instruct for the past 7 years you’re not really going to be able to comprehend something like the “entrainment’ demonstration he pulled off last Monday.

If you are new to RV and have read a few websites, or if you have taken a basic class, you cannot fully grasp and understand what Glenn is about. I’ve heard him ask many times over the years, “In all the targets we’ve done, have I EVER told you anything about the target in advance?” (He has not.) He constantly harps on chain of custody procedures, and constantly reminds us that just one small “Whoops”- one case where the demonstration of a skill was less than true and valid- would call into question all of our work.

I’ve watched Glenn pull out of his back pocket a sketch of a target I cued in private- without his knowledge- not meant for him to work- an exact sketch of a photograph I had selected as a target for students. That was back in the early days and it made my knees buckle. (Account of this is published in the library.)

I personally had a certified notary public notarize a prediction Glenn made in 1998 that came true exactly as his session outlined. The prediction was notarized 2 weeks prior to the event. (This is also published under Projects- Prediction Experiment.)

One class watched Glenn work a target (because he felt the need to do so) at a white board “live” in front of the class. He drew a school and a boy shooting a girl at point blank range. Several weeks later Columbine High School shootings made headlines.

Upon arriving in Mesquite, Nevada for an IRVA conference – Glenn’s first trip outside of Hawaii in several years- I heard with my own ears Glenn say “I need to find a slot machine with a picture of a bow tie on it.” He admitted that he had remote viewed the graphic scheme of a winning slot machine. I walked through the casino and found a machine called “Black Tie” with bow ties as the winning combination. I looked over my shoulder, started pumping money and quickly won a few hundred bucks. THEN I told Glenn and watched and photographed as he cleaned trays and trays of $5 gold coins out of that machine. (Photos published in Library)

I overhead someone explain Keno to Glenn at a dinner table and then witnessed Glenn pick 8 out of 10 numbers correctly in the next game.

During a class on tagging Glenn produced a bag of poker chips. Several hundred red, white, and blue chips. He had the class write down predictions- first chip blue, second chip white, third chip blue, fourth red, etc. etc. I watched Pat call 10 in a row without a miss. Figure the odds of that one, if your calculator has that many numbers on it.

Then there was the time the class worked a target to take on the University of Texas RV skeptic website. Our submitted data clearly and without a doubt described the target, and the skeptic site closed shop for good. Oh, did we tell you “The Rest Of The Story?” Two days BEFORE THE FEEDBACK WAS REVEALED on that site, Glenn gave us a class target. The target that night was The Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Then the feedback was revealed for the skeptic test we had just sent in. It was The Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Do you think THAT was a coincidence?

The Guild Lore is full of tales like this. I could go on and on, and will some day in book.

But I’m sorry, but if you haven’t been along for the ride then you just aren’t going to understand. I just want to stress that Glenn conducts guild RV with integrity, and that he is the most amazing person I’ve even had the privilege to be associated with.

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: The Matrix Myth…
Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2003-07-19 13:50 HST
Message ID: 18238
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

The Matrix Myth

The concept or idea of the Matrix as it is believed to exist by Remote Viewers is more than likely completely and utterly false. Frame of reference, perspective, and academic preference drove the formulation of the initial hypothesis for such an environment. It was an instance where there was really no one smart enough to disprove what it was not. I will tell you what we in Special Forces believed about the source of the well from which all Remote Viewing data springs.

Some years ago I spent a great deal of time in South America working and conducting operations while assigned to a SOD team of the 7th Special Forces Group (Airborne) out of Ft. Bragg. The Sergeant Major came by my hooch one day and told me to get my gear ready; we were going to see the Weatherman. This struck me as a bit odd knowing the two Air Force weather/Intel personnel had a hut not a hundred meters away from the SOD team. Who the heck was the Weatherman?

I got my gear and we humped for 2 days through the jungle and entered a small camp of indigenous natives where the leader greeted the SGM with big smiles and bear hugs. After hours of chatter and food and just noise we went in to see the Weatherman. An old man perhaps 85 or 86, a plaid checked pizza hut shirt and short black pants with legs that seemed to skinny and frail to walk on. He sat on a pile of magazines; most of them seemed to be catalogs from the Tandy Leather Company. Pictures torn from the magazines were strewn about the dirt floor. Horses and saddles, bridles and rigging.

The Sergeant Major pulled out a bag from his rucksack and passed it to the old man who opened and rummaged its contents smiling brightly. Bill (the SGM) told the man that he needed a dark night with rain and thunder, and it needed to be sometime soon. The old man thought a bit and reached for a long string with bright beads. He began counting the beads and stopped at 27. He then stated that in 27 days such a night could be had. Early the next morning we began the hump back to the base camp. 26 days later I lost 250 dollars to the SGM as the skies opened and the torrents of rain began to rake the camp as 36 heavily armed men departed to cross a nearby border.

It really hurt to pay up on that one but Bill said something that I will always remember.

"It doesn’t have to be a truth, he just has believe it". "It is the arbitrary nature of truth that entrains us all". It was my first introduction to the theory of Entrainment.

The logic of the universe at our level of understanding is a combination of physical laws and non-physical theory. The tools of the Weatherman were beads and string while we concentrate to detect the rip or tear in a linear ideogram. The process of mind must contain critical elements of belief that engage the subconscious engine.

When Dick came to HRVG it was not without training. He had attended the Farsight Institute prior. We were beginning some applications using directional ideograms and Dick commented that he had learned a bit at Farsight that seemed related. I asked him to share in a demonstration. Using a crudely drawn map of the USA he correctly demonstrated the ability to determine the line of travel between two cities (he didn’t know) a nation apart several times in succession. No small feat of mind but not quite our requirement. Dick had already been entrained by his experiences at Farsight and quickly adapted to our requirements.

The Matrix, as others proffer it in the community is not real, and not physical. It is an idea of the "how" of it all made by people who don’t really know but have an idea of what it must be like. The concept of a signal line or pathway servicing this Matrix is the plausible method of access of the day. But this will change, and probably within the next 10 to 15 years as we upgrade our physical laws and redefine our non-physical theory. Our arbitrary truth of it will get much closer to the concept of mental radio. Propagation theories will consolidate to include low-level quantum propagation theories above and below the border between the classical and the quantum. It will happen with the discovery by NSA of the first Logic Quantum Harmonic not too far in the near future. It will be the identification of the coherent pathway between the Macro and the Micro Universe.

Quantum Propagation will be the next leap, and most of us will be here for it. The Matrix will fade, as will its predecessor, the Akashic Record, as we finally get some wits about us.

Back to Special Forces I said that I would share our belief in regards to the how of it all.

Adaptation and propagation of the mind and its environment entrained using sequential thought processes are a fundamental core belief in SOF. We believe that the interconnectivity between all things is accessible via prudent means. While most means may be arbitrary it is the results that count and the means should tailor to the individual operator. The process is geared to developing the individual to integrate into the environment not fight against it. The remote Viewing experience is one of superior communication between the human and his environment.

Thought in the human is propagated wave activity. Consciousness is born of brain and mind on a foundation of bio-tissue, electromagnetics, and chemicals and exists not in matter but in fields and effects. This is a propagated environment. In lieu of some fact greater than this we believe Remote Viewing to be a most elegant propagation anomaly.

Some would shout that they cannot prove a propagation link IE frequencies, environment etc and would tell you that they looked high and low. My comments to this are that you must look to the viewer first, always. To find the trail you must begin at the beginning. We know that it is the actions of the mind of the viewer (a propagation based environment) that is the sender and receiver of the information gathered in the RV process. Virtually every action generated by anyone in the entire process, Tasker, Viewer, Analyst, and the End User, are based in a thought-propagated activity and there is someone who would believe less of the Viewing environment as propagated. That is adverse to the way of pathway in all things.

Glenn B. Wheaton

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: The Matrix Myth… Addendum
Poster: Glenn B. Wheaton
Date: 2003-07-19 22:32 HST
Message ID: 18246
In Reply To: 18238
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

Aloha,

Since my post I have received a few emails inquiring mostly "what is a Logic Quantum Harmonic"? I worked a technology project last year on which I have received feedback. While I won’t out the source I will share that it was the origin of the LQH.

The LQH is the string between the single atom and the quantum. Unlike the diatomic quantum harmonic projections, the LQH is the root pathway below the barrier of the visible and the perceptual as it relates to that single atom. It was the isolation of an equation that allowed for identification of the presence of a harmonic below the threshold of the macro universe by something in the macro universe. It was our impression that this was a key find for a platform that appeared to deal with teleportation of data instead of transmission of data. It would seem the ultimate secure communication methodology.

The idea itself was intriguing.

GBW

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: The Matrix Myth… Addendum
Poster: Dick
Date: 2003-07-19 23:13 HST
Message ID: 18248
In Reply To: 18246
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content] Aloha,

I worked a technology project last year on which I have received feedback. While I won’t out the source I will share that it was the origin of the LQH.

Glenn,

Let’s see some of your sessions on THAT one…lol
I’d love to see even your first VISID.

Dick

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: The Matrix Myth…
Poster: David
Date: 2003-07-20 09:48 HST
Message ID: 18254
In Reply To: 18238
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content]

The concept or idea of the Matrix as it is believed to exist by Remote Viewers is more than likely completely and utterly false…

I’m glad to see that I’m not the only one who doesn’t subscribe to the matrix/signal line hypothesis, at least how they’re popularly understood and propagated. It’s just never seemed right to me. I’ve always been inclined to think that resonance should be at the core of any hypothesis or theory regarding RV and other related activities (which LQH seems to be if I understand Glenn’s post correctly).

David

[End message content]

[Start message header]

Subject: Re: The Matrix Myth…
Poster: joanie
Date: 2003-07-21 22:10 HST
Message ID: 18273
In Reply To: 18254
Has Replies:

[End message header]

[Start message content] I’m glad to see that I’m not the only one who doesn’t subscribe to the matrix/signal line hypothesis, at least how they’re popularly understood and propagated. It’s just never seemed right to me. I’ve always been inclined to think that resonance should be at the core of any hypothesis or theory regarding RV and other related activities (which LQH seems to be if I understand Glenn’s post correctly).

David

Hello David~

Amen to you.

David Byrne and the Talking Heads have a song that reconciles the two: signal line and resonance… tell me what you think about this if you will.

Perhaps it is like wave and particle, and the grass is green and the grass grows.

it’s called "Radio Head" from the movie, "True Stories"…one of my favorite films indeed. These are the lyrics:

"Baby your mind is a radio

Got a reciever inside my head
Baby I’m tuned to your wavelength
Lemme tell you what it says:

Transmitter!

Oh! Picking up something good
Hey, radio head!
The sound…of a brand-new world.

So look at my fingers vibrate

From their tip down down to my toes
Now I’m recieving your signal
We’re gonna leave the land of noise

Transmitter!

Oh! Picking up something good
Hey, radio head!
The sound…of a brand-new world.

Transmitter!

Oh! Picking up something good
Hey, radio head!
The sound…Of a brand-new world.

Now you and I have no secrets

Now baby, lemme read your mind
I hear ev’rything you’re thinking
You can’t help the way you sound

Transmitter!

Picking up something good.
Hey! Radio head!
The sound…Of a brand-new world
Oh! Radio Head
Radio Head
Radio Head
Radio Head"

Methinks David Byrne got this down and wrote such songs to express such. I think, then again, maybe not :-) as he would say: "Do you know what I mean OR do you?"

In the Spirit of Feeling Resonances (‘specially the sweet ones! ga ga goo goo),

Joanie

[End message content]

Glenn,

Just a short note to say thanks for the links, which I will bookmark.

Regards, Steve.

Aloha RG,

Let me see if some previous posts claify it. Then I will follow up and give you a summary explanation.

Glenn